A&G類高分寫作思路有何不同

A&G類高分寫作思路有何不同

雅思寫作大作文(Task2)四項評分細則（Task Response, Coherence and Cohesion, Lexical Resource, Grammatical Range and Accuracy）中第一項是對作文思路和內容的打分，這一項的分數也基本奠定了文章整體的分數走向，因為邏輯和語言的展現都基于內容的扣題有效。

但是，在實際復習或考試中，很多同學并不清楚寫作思路和內容的重要性。大多數考生只求寫作時“有沒有思路”或“內容算不算跑題”，如此的標準和追求，想拿6真的很費勁。

此外，有時明明是A類考生，作文思路卻接近口語素材；再或者，參加的是G類考試，卻用A類高分作文較難的思路來折磨自己，心累。

在這里要提醒大家的是，現在A類和G類大作文題庫重合率越來越高（超過80%）。換句話說，過去只出現在A類考試中的話題和題目，比如犯罪類問題，現在也會經常出現在G類考試中，但頻率確實略低于A類考試；G類考試較簡單的高頻考題，比如看電視對孩子的影響，現在也會時不時出現在A類考試中。

總結一下，A類大作文考題涉及的話題和討論對象更多，同時包含部分G類常規考題；G類大作文考題整體難度略低于A類考試，雖然涉及少量較有難度的考題，但A類考題中比較靈活、較有挑戰的題目并不會出現。

來，上真題：

When new towns are planned, it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

我們在這里分析的這道題目難度系數適中，在A和G類考試中都不止一次出現。這道題目是城市類問題中出現比較頻繁的建設、規劃布局類問題，屬于多討論對象題目：“public parks or sports facilities”，“shopping centers”。

首先說說推薦給G類考生的寫作思路：

建設新的城市，修建不同的基礎設施和建筑物功能目的不同；所以這道題可以側重某一個方面論證或走中立結構。修建“public parks or sports facilities”對人們的健康有益，并且可以美化城市環境；建設“shopping centers”可以滿足人們對現代生活的需求，并有助于促進城市經濟發展。G類作文能寫明白這些內容就棒棒了！

A類和G類作文對思路要求的廣度和高度不一樣，尤其是需要6分以上的分數，所以A類考生要做到：

1.?首先需要明確一點：雅思作文考題幾乎全部關乎社會現象和社會問題，尤其是A類作文的出題一定是反映當下實際生活，所以在構思時要盡量客觀、思考全面，提出的觀點不要過于personal 。比如，審題時想想大多數人生活中的選擇會怎樣，寫作的方向是否和現實生活統一。舉例說明：談及到國際旅游業，無論題目涉及到何種消極影響的討論，不要忘記旅游產業作為全球最大的產業之一整體是積極的發展；再比如，科技在日常生活中的應用，無論題目出現針對何種隱患的討論，在大多數情況下科技對現代生活的積極作用是不可取代的。

2.?其次，在第一點的基礎上，尤其是在寫議論文的時候，審題一定要結合相關的社會熱點問題，這樣文章觀點的鮮明度和論證的力度都會大大提升。比如我們分析的這道題目，建造更多的“public parks or sports facilities”可以給人們提供更多的健身、鍛煉的機會，可以借此推廣健康的生活方式，畢竟“The health level of the general public is declining and most people are leading a sedentary lifestyle”。側重這個角度寫作正好可以結合健康這個高頻出題的話題：現代城市人們健康問題有隱患，加上人口老齡化，醫療服務對政府的財政壓力很大… … 這一系列嚴肅問題的解決可直接通過預防，即建造更多的“public parks or sports facilities”得以緩解。如此論證，還缺可寫的內容么？當然，并不是說不需要建設“shopping centers”，可以將這部分的討論放在讓步段。

3.? 最后，基本但卻極其重要的一點要提醒大家：議論文無論用什么結構展開，一定要體現辯證思想，切忌單一論證一面；就算力度很大的支持一個觀點，讓步段也需要提及注意的地方。

雅思備考中，請大家務必熟悉各個話題及常見的出題角度、整理總結成熟的思路、學會靈活的審題、使用最新的素材范文練習，這樣才不會悶頭苦惱“我怎么想不出來這樣的思路呢？”

參考范文：

When new towns are planned, it is important to build more public parks or sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

When there is a town development initiative under way, the improvement of community facilities is considered in the development plan. While some are in favor of the construction of shopping centers, I would argue that more public parks and sports facilities should be built.

Initially, well-designed public parks and sports facilities can make a place more attractive physically. They can provide gathering spots that improve the social character of community life and serve to increase residents’ interaction with one another; therefore, they create a greater sense of community that reaches across different community sectors.

Secondly, well-equipped public parks and sports facilities offer exposure to and opportunities for a wide variety of physical activities. It is evident that the health level of the general publicis declining rapidly now and that most people are leading a sedentary lifestyle. For many citizens, affordable and accessible community facilities have been their introduction to sports activities and a more active lifestyle. People with low income, particularly the youth, may have very limited chances for regular exercise. Thus, the investment in more public parks and sports facilities is crucial in encouraging a healthier lifestyle.

Undoubtedly, shopping centers today are necessary not only because of their roles as places for purchasing products for daily consumption but also due to their recreational functions to meet the need of urban lifestyle. But given the fact real estate developers have already given more than enough attention to their importance when planning a new place, we need to consider previously ignored aspects .

To conclude, I believe that public parks and sports facilities contribute to the general quality of life in the community and that there should be more of them than places such as shopping centers.